This is a silly little parable that has floated around on 4chan for a while:
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this.
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So. that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said. “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by $20.” Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free but what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realised that $20 divided by six is $3.33 but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four mar still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage. They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving).
The sixth man now paid $2 instead of $3 (a 33% saving).
The seventh man now paid $5 instead of $7 (a 28% saving).
The eighth man now paid $9 instead of $12 (a 25% saving).
The ninth man now paid $14 instead of $18 (a 22% saving).
And the tenth man now paid $49 instead of $59 (a 16% saving).
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.
But, once outside the bar, the men begin to compare their savings. “I only got $1 out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man. “but he got $10!”
“Yeah, that‘s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a $1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I only got $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “We didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, labour and greens is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Taxation is one of those things that I’d rather not touch too much on; whether the current system, or at least the principles behind them, are good, or whether it should be scrapped and replaced with something completely different, is too complicated a topic over a simple post like this. However one simple thing that everyone can take away from just reading the above story is that percentages makes a world of difference.
A common behavior the media engage in nowadays is that they like to throw big numbers at you without giving you too much context behind them. I’ve sure you’ve seen the typical “politician X’s plan will save the rich Y amount of money per year, but only Z amount for the poor!” messages as alluded to in the tale above. Such messages are not designed to inform, but simply to get a quick emotional response out of you and in the long term, the lead you down to a black and white way of looking at the world. However as you can see, once you go a bit deeper into the numbers and apply some percentages to them for better comparison, the numbers are now put in context and the issue is no longer black and white, but one with nuances requiring more deliberation.
Looking around more, you’ll notice all sorts of news articles and even sloppy academic study where big numbers are simply regurgitated at you to elicit a quick emotional response out of you. A simple technique to better protect yourself from being led around like a bull by the nose ring is to just try to apply some percentages to whatever numbers you’re being shown. This often requires that you do additional research on your own, but the end result is that you end up better informed.
Original screen cap: