A 4chan discussion on the repercussions of sex robots/robot companions, more roughly referred to as “Robo waifus”, draws out a surprisingly philosophical analysis from one anon:
Chi, the robot girl who serves as the focus of the anime Chobits, which deals with the issue of robot companions and their impact on human society.
Pure logic take: Girls don’t like sex to begin with, it is a way to keep a man around. Women “give” sex and men “give” resources. Each stage of a relationship, you give up something to become something else. You give up freedom when single to date. You give up freedom from responsibility when you live together. You give up the ability to walk away free & clear from the woman when you have a child. The traditional utility of children for boys was labor and for girls the ability to increase family wealth. The time horizon to value on a child is 12ish years. Now we don’t live in an environment where children can ever provide resources back to the family. If you want something cute to care for outside of yourself, you can get a pet. It is cheaper.
Pure emotional take: Average girls no longer want traditional relationship. Average men can’t provide traditional relationship environment or resources. American/western women are overtly masculine (promiscuity, earning money, tattoos etc). The men are feminized by the constraints of society (computer job, family court, laws, etc).
Why do feminists hate robowaifus?
Since nobody in the thread seems to have nailed it yet I’ll tell you.
Because it redefines what a woman is supposed to be. Men built their ideal woman. Women compete. And they will compete with that. They know they will. And in doing so, what a woman is, is redefined and the women didn’t define it. And this terrifies feminists. It breaks the entire thing. There won’t BE feminism once there are robot sex bots.
The women will desperately try to be better than the sex bots, making women exactly what we want them to be, and then we probably won’t even need the sex bots, except to keep women on their toes. > Pic related > Susan has married Steven, and Diane, his robo mistress, is showing happy Susan how to run the home, and make Steven happy before she leaves as she is no longer needed.
>Why do simps exist? They really are a scourge
The myth of the garden of eden shows what the TRUE original sin is. Satan (or possibly Lilith) tempted who? Eve obviously because she’s a stupid bitch. Otherwise why not tempt Adam instead? And what is Adam’s excuse for breaking the only one rule God had given him to follow? >Eve gave it to me, and I ate
That’s right. Adam wasn’t even fooled by Satan, he knew what he was supposed to do. But Eve did it already, and Adam couldn’t just let her dumb ass get expelled. He couldn’t stand to be without her. Thus proving that Adam valued Eve over God. True blasphemy.
Thus I conclude that simping is the original sin that has eventually led to the destruction of the world during Apocalypse As you watch the world burn, understand this: simping is what caused it.
Simping and overindulgence in feminist ideologies is indeed what caused a lot of the troubles in society today. Will humanoid companion robots the likes of which this anon talks about ever come into being, though? Ones that are realistic enough to qualify as an ideal female? Much excitement awaits us in the future that is yet to come. I can see myself buying one, even just to cook and clean around the house.
>Why do simps exist? They really are a scourge
Temple of Zagan 