Temple of Zagan

An anon on 4chan posts an in-depth analysis on the attempted assassination on Trump, which leads down to a rather dark rabbit hole:

I. Introduction
The recent attempted assassination of Donald Trump has raised numerous questions, not only about the audacity of the act itself but also about the highly improbable series of events leading up to it. When examined closely, these events form a narrative that defies the realm of mere coincidence and instead suggests a coordinated and malicious conspiracy. This article will dissect each aspect of the plot, demonstrating the improbability of these events occurring independently and making a compelling case for a concerted effort behind the scenes.

On the surface, the attempted assassination might appear to be the work of a lone, radicalized individual. However, a deeper examination reveals a web of connections and systematic failures that point to something far more sinister. From the detailed planning and execution of the attack to the glaring security lapses and suspicious financial maneuvers in the days leading up to it, the evidence suggests a level of orchestration that could not be achieved by a single individual acting alone.

Key points of this analysis will include the background and preparation of the shooter, the specific events on the day of the attempt, the execution of the plan, the systematic security failures that occurred, and the financial connections that implicate powerful entities such as BlackRock. Each section will delve into the specifics, piecing together the puzzle that reveals a coordinated effort to carry out the assassination.

By the end of this article, it will be clear that the events surrounding the attempted assassination of Donald Trump were not random or coincidental. Instead, they were the result of meticulous planning, insider knowledge, and deliberate actions taken by individuals and entities with the means and motive to influence the outcome. This case demands a thorough investigation to uncover the true extent of the conspiracy and to hold those responsible accountable.

II. Background and Preparation

The background and preparation phase of the attempted assassination on Donald Trump provides crucial insights into the planning and capabilities of the shooter. By examining the shooter’s profile and the strategic maneuvers leading up to the event, we can begin to piece together a narrative that points to a meticulously planned conspiracy.

The Shooter’s Profile

At the center of this incident is a 20-year-old ROTC rifle reject. Despite being deemed unfit for military rifle training, this individual managed to orchestrate an incredibly sophisticated attack. What’s more alarming is his appearance in BlackRock marketing materials, which immediately raises questions about how a seemingly insignificant figure could be connected to one of the world’s most powerful financial institutions.

The young man’s capabilities far exceeded what would be expected from someone with his background. His actions indicate not only detailed knowledge of the event’s security layout but also a high level of training and preparation. This suggests that he was not acting alone but was likely supported by individuals or entities with significant resources and expertise.

The Shooter’s Preparations

On the day of the attempted assassination, the shooter executed a carefully planned sequence of actions. He began by parking his vehicle at a Home Depot located a mile away from the event. This strategic choice of parking location was likely intended to avoid drawing attention to his activities. From there, he walked the mile to the event site, carrying a rifle (an AR-15), backpack, binoculars, and a 12-foot ladder.

The ability to transport such equipment without raising suspicion is remarkable and indicates a well-thought-out plan. However, this also raises significant doubts about the official narrative. Given the cumbersome nature of the equipment, the likelihood of the shooter walking the entire distance without being noticed by traffic cameras or passersby is extremely low. This discrepancy suggests that the shooter was most likely transported by other means, possibly with assistance from individuals who ensured his actions remained undetected.

Knowledge of Security Layout

The shooter demonstrated an uncanny knowledge of the event’s security layout. He knew exactly where to climb onto the roof of AGR International to avoid detection by three counter-sniper teams. This level of knowledge is highly improbable without insider information. It suggests that the shooter either had access to detailed security plans or was assisted by someone with intimate knowledge of the security arrangements.

Summary of Preparation Phase

The background and preparation phase of the attempted assassination on Donald Trump reveals a highly coordinated effort involving multiple entities and significant resources. The shooter’s profile, his detailed knowledge of the security layout, and the meticulous planning all point to a carefully planned conspiracy.

In the next section, we will delve into the specific events on the day of the attempt, highlighting the detailed planning and execution of the attack. This will further illustrate the improbability of these events occurring independently and reinforce the case for a coordinated conspiracy.

III. The Day of the Attempt

The day of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump was marked by a series of meticulously executed actions that underscore the sophistication and planning behind the attack. Each step taken by the shooter demonstrates a high level of preparation and knowledge, suggesting that this was not the work of an isolated individual but rather a coordinated effort involving multiple actors with insider information.

Execution of the Plan

The shooter initially climbed onto the roof of AGR International, using a rangefinder to assess the distance to his target. This initial climb went unnoticed, allowing him to return later with the AR-15. His ability to climb the roof twice without detection is alarming and suggests either a significant security lapse or intentional oversight.

On the roof, the shooter benefited from several inexplicable oversights:
• Sniper team 1 was blocked by a tree.
• Sniper team 2 was similarly blocked.
• Sniper team 3 was at a lower elevation and blocked by the roof apex.
• All three sniper teams were suspiciously looking in the same direction, ignoring other high-risk areas.

These oversights are not just coincidental. The alignment and focus of the sniper teams suggest a coordinated effort to create blind spots. The fact that all three teams were looking in the same direction implies a planned distraction or intentional misdirection.

Proximity to the Target

The shooter managed to get within 120 yards of the presidential candidate, who was “protected” by the USSS on the roof of AGR International. He was spotted 30 minutes before the attack, pointing his gun at a cop, but no action was taken to pull the candidate to safety. It is worth noting that had the cop fired a warning shot into the ground, standard protection protocols would have been activated. This failure to act on immediate threat information is inexcusable and indicates either a breakdown in communication or a deliberate decision to ignore the threat.

Despite crawling on a hot, sloped metal roof for three minutes with a heart rate likely soaring to 180 bpm after carrying heavy gear for a mile, the shooter remained steady enough to aim and fire. The physical and mental composure required for such a feat is extraordinary and suggests extensive training or a high level of preparedness.

Summary of the Day of the Attempt

The events on the day of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump were marked by a series of highly improbable actions and security lapses. The shooter’s detailed knowledge of the security layout, the absence of critical surveillance measures, the inadequacy of the USSS protection, and the coordinated oversights of the sniper teams all point to a meticulously planned conspiracy. This reinforces the notion that this was not a random act but a deliberate and coordinated attempt on Trump’s life.

In the next section, we will delve into the systematic security failures that occurred and the signs of malice that point to a larger conspiracy. This will further illustrate the improbability of these events occurring independently and reinforce the case for a coordinated effort behind the scenes.

IV. Systematic Security Failures and Signs of Malice

The attempted assassination of Donald Trump revealed a series of systematic security failures that, when examined collectively, point to an orchestrated plot rather than a series of unfortunate coincidences. These failures span multiple areas of the security operation, each adding to the improbability of the event being a mere accident. The consistent pattern of oversight and misalignment suggests a deliberate attempt to weaken security and facilitate the attack. Many of these failures represent a willful disregard of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and cannot simply be chalked up to coincidence.

Designated Sectors Ignored

In any high-profile security operation, the concept of designated sectors is crucial. Security personnel are assigned specific zones to monitor, ensuring that all areas are covered and potential threats are identified and neutralized. In this case, the designated sectors were either not properly established or completely ignored. The shooter’s ability to exploit these blind spots indicates either gross negligence or insider information.

The shooter knew exactly where to position himself to avoid detection by the sniper teams. This level of precision implies a deep understanding of the security layout, likely obtained through detailed security plans or insider assistance. The designated sectors should have provided overlapping fields of vision, but the alignment of the sniper teams created significant blind spots.

Misaligned Sniper Teams

The sniper teams, a critical component of the security detail, were systematically misaligned. Sniper teams 1 and 2 were blocked by trees, while sniper team 3 was positioned at a lower elevation and blocked by the roof apex. This misalignment severely limited their ability to detect and respond to threats.

Typically, sniper teams are strategically positioned to provide overlapping fields of vision, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the event area. The fact that all three teams were looking in the same direction suggests a coordinated effort to create these blind spots. This is not a simple oversight but a deliberate attempt to direct the sniper teams’ attention away from critical areas.

Critical Overwatch Positions Left Unguarded

One of the most egregious security failures was the decision to leave critical overwatch positions, such as the water tower, unguarded. These positions provide a clear vantage point over the event and are essential for monitoring potential threats. The absence of security at these positions created a significant vulnerability that the shooter exploited.

In high-security scenarios, all potential vantage points should be monitored to prevent exploits. The decision to leave these positions unguarded indicates either a gross oversight or intentional weakening of the security protocol. Given the importance of these positions, the failure to guard them is highly suspicious.

Ineffective Coordination and Communication

The sniper teams were not communicating effectively, leading to critical blind spots. Effective communication is vital in high-stakes scenarios to ensure all potential threat vectors are covered. The lack of coordination among the sniper teams resulted in a failure to detect and respond to the shooter.

In high-profile security operations, communication protocols are established to maintain situational awareness and coordinate responses. The breakdown in communication observed in this incident suggests either a failure to adhere to these protocols or intentional interference.

Lack of Immediate Action by Cops

Cops stationed outside AGR International did nothing when the shooter pointed a gun at them. All the cop needed to do was shoot into the ground to enact protection actions, but this basic response was not taken. Similarly, cops inside the AGR International building did nothing while the shooter climbed the roof.

The inaction of the cops indicates a significant lapse in security procedures. The failure to respond to a direct threat raises questions about their training, instructions, and potential involvement in the conspiracy.

Untrained or Underqualified Personnel

The replacement of highly trained USSS agents with less experienced Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) females compromised the effectiveness of the security detail. The timing and nature of these personnel changes raise questions about their motivations. Deploying less experienced personnel at such a critical time undermined the overall security operation.

The decision to replace experienced agents with less qualified personnel suggests an intentional effort to weaken the security detail. This change in personnel likely contributed to the numerous lapses and failures observed during the event.

Summary of Systematic Security Failures

The systematic security failures observed during the attempted assassination of Donald Trump highlight a coordinated effort to weaken the security operation and facilitate the attack. The ignored designated sectors, misaligned sniper teams, unguarded critical overwatch positions, ineffective coordination and communication, and the failure of immediate action by the cops all point to a deliberate attempt to undermine security.

The involvement of untrained or underqualified personnel further indicates a coordinated conspiracy. These consistent security lapses and oversights suggest a well-planned operation involving multiple actors working together to execute the attack. Many of these failures represent a willful disregard of SOPs and cannot simply be chalked up to coincidence.

V. The Ridiculous and Dubious Claims of the USSS Director

Following the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, the United States Secret Service (USSS) Director made several claims that, upon closer inspection, appear not only dubious but also indicative of a potential cover-up or gross negligence. These statements, intended to explain the security failures, raise more questions than they answer and suggest a deliberate effort to obfuscate the truth behind the incident.

Claim 1: AGR International Was Outside the Secure Perimeter

One of the most questionable assertions made by the USSS Director was that AGR International was outside the secure perimeter. Given the importance of comprehensive security for high-profile events, such as those involving a presidential candidate, this claim is highly suspect. Secure perimeters are meticulously planned and should encompass all potential vantage points that could be exploited by an attacker.

• Flawed Perimeter Planning: If AGR International was indeed outside the secure perimeter, it reflects a significant flaw in the planning and execution of security measures. High-risk locations, regardless of their perceived distance from the main event, should always be within the secure perimeter and closely monitored.
• Inconsistency with Standard Protocols: The exclusion of AGR International from the secure perimeter contradicts standard security protocols, which mandate the inclusion of all potential threat locations. This inconsistency raises questions about the integrity of the security planning process.

Claim 2: The Roof of AGR International Was Too Sloped to Be Considered a Threat

Another dubious claim by the USSS Director was that the roof of AGR International was too sloped to be considered a viable threat location. This assertion is problematic for several reasons:

• Overlooking Tactical Realities: The slope of a roof does not necessarily preclude its use as a vantage point for an attacker. Trained shooters are capable of adapting to various environments, and the physical characteristics of the roof should not have been dismissed so easily.
• Contradictory Evidence: The shooter successfully used the roof of AGR International to carry out the attack, which directly contradicts the USSS Director’s claim. This suggests either a lack of understanding of tactical realities or an intentional downplaying of the threat posed by the roof.

Claim 3: Failure to Justify Security Lapses

The USSS Director’s statements appeared to be attempts to justify the security lapses rather than addressing the root causes. This approach undermines the credibility of the explanations provided and suggests a possible cover-up:

• Deflecting Responsibility: By focusing on the supposed unsuitability of AGR International’s roof and its location outside the secure perimeter, the USSS Director effectively deflected responsibility for the security failures. This deflection raises suspicions about the true motivations behind the security decisions.
• Lack of Accountability: The failure to acknowledge and address the real reasons for the security lapses indicates a lack of accountability within the USSS. This lack of accountability is problematic in ensuring the integrity and effectiveness of future security operations.

Ignoring High-Risk Locations

The USSS Director’s claims also reflect a broader issue of ignoring high-risk locations that should have been included in the security plan:

• Overwatch Positions: Critical overwatch positions, such as the water tower, were left unguarded. These locations should have been monitored to prevent exactly the kind of exploit the shooter used. The decision to leave these positions unguarded indicates either a gross oversight or intentional weakening of the security protocol.
• Blind Spots: The misalignment of sniper teams and the failure to cover all potential threat vectors created blind spots that the shooter exploited. The USSS Director’s failure to address these blind spots points to a deeper issue of inadequate threat assessment and response planning.

Summary of Dubious Claims

The claims made by the USSS Director in the aftermath of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump are not only dubious but also indicative of a potential cover-up or gross negligence. The assertions that AGR International was outside the secure perimeter and that its roof was too sloped to be considered a threat are both inconsistent with standard security protocols and contradicted by the events that unfolded.

These statements, rather than providing clarity, raise further questions about the integrity of the security planning process and the true motivations behind the decisions made. The failure to acknowledge and address the real reasons for the security lapses points to a lack of accountability and a potential deliberate effort to obfuscate the truth.

In the next section, we will explore the financial connections that point to a larger conspiracy, focusing on the ties between BlackRock, Roper Technologies, and Indicor. This will further illustrate the improbability of these events occurring independently and reinforce the case for a coordinated effort behind the scenes.

VI. The BlackRock, Indicor, Roper, AGR Connection and US Government Contracts

The financial and corporate connections surrounding the attempted assassination of Donald Trump reveal a web of relationships that point to a larger conspiracy. By examining the ties between BlackRock, Indicor, Roper Technologies, AGR International, and their involvement in US government contracts, we can further illustrate the improbability of these events occurring independently and reinforce the case for a coordinated effort behind the scenes.

BlackRock’s Influence and Investments

BlackRock, one of the world’s largest asset management firms, has significant influence across various industries through its vast investment portfolio. Its connections to the entities involved in this case raise substantial concerns:

• Seed Investment in Roper Technologies: BlackRock’s initial funding of Roper Technologies positions it at the core of this intricate network. Roper Technologies, in turn, has established itself as a major player in the industrial sector, particularly in specialized technology and equipment.
• Financial Power and Influence: BlackRock’s substantial financial resources and investment strategies provide it with considerable influence over the companies in which it invests. This influence extends to strategic decisions and operational directions, potentially including those that impact national security.

The Formation of Indicor by Roper Technologies

Roper Technologies, leveraging BlackRock’s investment, formed Indicor to manage its portfolio of specialized businesses. This strategic move integrates various high-tech and industrial companies under one umbrella, further consolidating influence and control:

• Creation of Indicor: Indicor was formed to streamline the management of Roper Technologies’ diverse portfolio. This included the acquisition and integration of several companies, enhancing operational efficiency and market reach.
• Acquisition of AGR International: One of the key acquisitions by Indicor was AGR International, a company with significant ties to the Department of Defense (DoD) and federal agencies. This acquisition positioned Indicor as a critical player in the industrial and defense sectors.

AGR International’s Strategic Importance

AGR International’s connections to the DoD and other federal agencies highlight its strategic importance. The company’s expertise and contracts with the US government place it at the center of national security and defense operations:

• DoD Contracts: AGR International holds numerous contracts with the DoD, providing specialized technology and equipment critical to national defense. These contracts necessitate a high level of security clearance and operational integrity.
• Federal Agency Involvement: Beyond the DoD, AGR International collaborates with various federal agencies, further embedding itself within the infrastructure of national security.

Financial Maneuvers: Shorting $DJT Stocks

In the days leading up to the assassination attempt, $DJT stocks were shorted en masse. This financial strategy involves borrowing stocks and selling them with the hope of buying them back at a lower price, thus profiting from the difference. The massive shorting of $DJT stocks suggests that those involved had foreknowledge of an event that would negatively impact the market.

• Scale and Confidence: Shorting stocks on such a scale requires substantial capital and confidence in the anticipated outcome. This indicates that the conspirators had detailed information about the assassination attempt and expected it to succeed, causing a significant drop in the stock market.
• Sophisticated Operation: The level of financial maneuvering points to a sophisticated and well-funded operation, likely involving individuals with deep knowledge of financial markets and the impending attack.
• Historical Comparisons: This tactic of shorting stocks in anticipation of a major event is not unprecedented. Similar patterns were observed prior to the 9/11 attacks, where airline stocks were heavily shorted, and prior to the 10/06/23 events in Israel, where certain Israeli stocks were shorted. In both cases, the stock market activities indicated foreknowledge of catastrophic events. The parallels to the shorting of $DJT stocks before the assassination attempt on Trump reinforce the suspicion of an orchestrated plot.

Indicor’s Role and Implications

Indicor’s acquisition of AGR International and its broader portfolio of companies underscore its strategic importance:
• Centralization of Influence: The formation of Indicor centralized the management and operational control of several key companies, enhancing strategic decision-making capabilities.
• Implications for National Security: Given AGR International’s role in national defense, Indicor’s influence over the company has significant implications for national security. This connection raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and vulnerabilities within the defense infrastructure.

BlackRock’s Strategic Positioning

BlackRock’s investment in Roper Technologies and, by extension, its influence over Indicor and AGR International, places it in a strategically powerful position:
• Influence Over Defense Contractors: Through its investments, BlackRock indirectly exerts influence over companies critical to national defense. This influence extends to strategic decisions that can impact national security.
• Potential Conflicts of Interest: The convergence of financial power and strategic defense operations under BlackRock’s influence presents potential conflicts of interest. These conflicts may compromise the integrity of national security operations.

Summary of Financial and Corporate Connections

The financial and corporate connections surrounding the attempted assassination of Donald Trump reveal a complex web of relationships involving BlackRock, Indicor, Roper Technologies, and AGR International. These connections, coupled with the companies’ involvement in US government contracts, illustrate the improbability of these events occurring independently. The strategic positioning and influence of BlackRock, combined with the operational importance of AGR International, point to a coordinated effort behind the scenes.

The financial maneuvers, such as the shorting of $DJT stocks, further underscore the sophistication and planning involved in the conspiracy. Drawing comparisons to the shorting of airline stocks before 9/11 and Israeli stocks before 10/06/23, it becomes evident that these stock market activities are indicative of foreknowledge and calculated efforts to profit from impending crises.

VII. The Shooter’s Connection to BlackRock

The connection between the shooter and BlackRock adds another layer of complexity to the narrative surrounding the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. This relationship underscores the depth of the conspiracy and highlights the potential involvement of powerful financial entities in orchestrating the attack.

The Shooter’s Background

The shooter, a 20-year-old ROTC rifle reject, managed to execute a highly sophisticated attack that would be difficult for even a trained operative to carry out alone. His ability to infiltrate the security perimeter and position himself on the roof of AGR International suggests extensive preparation and support. The shooter’s background, as someone who was previously rejected from a formal military program, raises questions about how he acquired the skills and knowledge necessary for such an operation.

Appearance in BlackRock Marketing Materials

One of the most startling revelations is the shooter’s appearance in BlackRock marketing materials. This connection is significant for several reasons:

• Unusual Association: It is highly unusual for an individual with no apparent high-profile background to feature in the marketing materials of a major financial institution like BlackRock. This suggests a deeper relationship between the shooter and the company.
• Potential Recruitment: The inclusion of the shooter in these materials may indicate that he was recruited or otherwise engaged by BlackRock. This raises questions about the nature of his involvement and the extent to which BlackRock may have influenced or supported his actions.

Possible Financial Motivations

BlackRock’s substantial financial resources and influence make it a key player in global markets. The company’s potential involvement in the assassination attempt could be motivated by several factors:

• Market Manipulation: By orchestrating an event that would significantly impact the stock market, BlackRock could stand to profit from the resulting market fluctuations. The shorting of $DJT stocks in the days leading up to the attack suggests that those involved had foreknowledge of the event and sought to capitalize on it.
• Strategic Objectives: Beyond financial gain, BlackRock may have had strategic objectives in orchestrating the attack. Influencing political outcomes and destabilizing certain entities could align with broader corporate goals.

BlackRock’s Influence and Operations

As one of the world’s largest asset management firms, BlackRock wields considerable influence over various industries. The shooter’s connection to BlackRock highlights the potential for the company to leverage its resources and networks in pursuit of its objectives:

• Operational Reach: BlackRock’s extensive reach and influence allow it to operate in various sectors, including finance, technology, and defense. This operational reach provides the company with the means to orchestrate complex operations and influence significant events.
• Network of Influence: The company’s vast network of influence includes numerous subsidiaries, investments, and strategic partnerships. This network can be mobilized to achieve specific goals, including those related to political and financial outcomes.

Implications of the Connection

The shooter’s connection to BlackRock raises significant concerns about the integrity of the assassination investigation and the potential for broader conspiracies involving powerful financial entities:

• Conflict of Interest: The involvement of a major financial institution in the assassination plot suggests a conflict of interest that could compromise the investigation’s integrity. Ensuring an impartial and thorough investigation is crucial to uncovering the full extent of the conspiracy.
• National Security: The connection between the shooter and BlackRock, coupled with the company’s influence over defense contractors like AGR International, highlights potential vulnerabilities in national security. Addressing these vulnerabilities is essential to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Summary of the Shooter’s Connection to BlackRock

The connection between the shooter and BlackRock adds a critical dimension to the narrative of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. The shooter’s background, combined with his appearance in BlackRock marketing materials, suggests a deeper relationship that warrants further investigation. This connection underscores the potential involvement of powerful financial entities in orchestrating the attack and highlights the need for a thorough and impartial investigation to uncover the true extent of the conspiracy.

In the final section, we will conclude by summarizing the key points and emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation to uncover the true extent of the conspiracy and hold those responsible accountable.

VIII. Conclusion & Summary

The attempted assassination of Donald Trump is a deeply troubling event that reveals a complex web of connections, systematic security failures, and potential conspiracies involving powerful financial entities. Through a detailed examination of the shooter’s background, the financial and corporate connections, and the significant security lapses, we have built a compelling case that this incident was not a mere coincidence but a coordinated and malicious conspiracy.

Summary of Key Points

1. Shooter’s Background and Preparation:
o A 20-year-old ROTC rifle reject managed to execute a sophisticated attack, demonstrating skills and knowledge far beyond what would be expected from his background.
o The shooter’s appearance in BlackRock marketing materials suggests a deeper relationship and potential recruitment by the financial giant.

2. The Day of the Attempt:
o The shooter’s actions on the day of the attempt were meticulously planned, from parking strategically a mile away to avoiding detection while carrying significant equipment.
o His knowledge of the security layout and ability to exploit blind spots indicate insider information or assistance.

3. Systematic Security Failures:
o The failure to establish and monitor designated security sectors allowed the shooter to position himself undetected.
o Misaligned sniper teams and unguarded critical overwatch positions point to deliberate weakening of security protocols.
o A lack of effective communication and immediate action by law enforcement further compromised the security operation.

4. Dubious Claims by the USSS Director:
o The USSS Director’s assertions that AGR International was outside the secure perimeter and that its roof was too sloped to be a threat are both inconsistent with standard security protocols and contradicted by the facts.
o These statements suggest an attempt to justify security lapses rather than addressing their root causes.

5. Financial Maneuvers and Market Manipulation:
o The shorting of $DJT stocks in the days leading up to the assassination attempt parallels historical patterns observed before significant events like 9/11 and 10/06/23, indicating foreknowledge and calculated financial gain.
o The scale of these financial maneuvers points to a sophisticated and well-funded operation, likely involving individuals with deep knowledge of financial markets and the impending attack.

6. Corporate Connections and Influence:
o BlackRock’s substantial investments and influence over Roper Technologies and Indicor, and their acquisition of AGR International, place it in a strategically powerful position with potential conflicts of interest.
o AGR International’s involvement in national defense contracts underscores the strategic importance and potential vulnerabilities in national security.

7. Shooter’s Connection to BlackRock:
o The connection between the shooter and BlackRock, including his appearance in their marketing materials, suggests a deeper relationship that implicates the financial giant in the conspiracy.
o This relationship raises significant concerns about the integrity of the assassination investigation and the potential for broader conspiracies involving powerful financial entities.

Conclusion

The evidence presented points to a meticulously planned and coordinated conspiracy involving multiple actors with significant resources and insider knowledge. The combination of systematic security failures, dubious official explanations, and sophisticated financial maneuvers indicates that the attempted assassination of Donald Trump was not the work of a lone individual but a well-orchestrated plot.

The connections between the shooter and BlackRock, along with the financial and corporate ties to Roper Technologies, Indicor, and AGR International, highlight the involvement of powerful entities with substantial influence over national security and financial markets. These connections underscore the need for a thorough and impartial investigation to uncover the true extent of the conspiracy and hold those responsible accountable.

Call for a Thorough Investigation

Given the complexity and seriousness of the evidence, it is imperative that a comprehensive investigation be conducted. This investigation must be independent and free from conflicts of interest to ensure that all aspects of the conspiracy are thoroughly examined. Only through such an investigation can we hope to uncover the truth, safeguard national security, and prevent similar incidents in the future.

The attempted assassination of Donald Trump is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within our security systems and the potential for malicious actors to exploit them. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that those who orchestrate such plots are brought to justice and that the integrity of our democratic processes is upheld.

 

 

 

Original essay saved from 4chan’s /pol board: https://pastebin.com/SUp2yAiZ

 

NEW: Soon-to-be unmasked entities bet that President Trump’s $DJT stock would plummet ONE DAY before the assassination attempt.

Shorts against the Truth Social stock more than doubled from July 1 -July 12, meaning, people or large organizations were predicting that by Monday… pic.twitter.com/axj41kmjpQ

— Died Suddenly (@DiedSuddenly_) July 17, 2024